|
 |
|
White
Papers
|
|
Our white papers are meant to be shared! Please send
these PDFs along to colleagues or customers who will benefit from
the information we’ve provided. Have additional questions?
That’s why we’re here! Just email us at sales@locusinc.com.
Thank you for visiting us, happy reading! |
|
| |
|
What is eLoran By G. Linn Roth, President, Locus,
Inc.
|
239kb |
|
Most of us are well aware of GPS’ role in navigation,
timing and frequency applications. Because GPS is vulnerable to
intentional, unintentional, and natural interference, the US government
is placing increased emphasis on technologies that can mitigate
overdependence on GPS in these critical applications. Loran is very
complementary to GPS and can backup GPS in multiple applications.
While GPS technology is satellite-based and high frequency, Loran
uses ground-based transmitters
and is low frequency. Loran signals are very high-powered, so they
penetrate cities, buildings and
densely foliaged areas where low level GPS signals are often blocked.
From a practical perspective,
Loran is virtually unjammable because of its high power.
|
|
|
|
The Case
for Loran By G. Linn Roth, President, Locus, Inc.
|
1.1mb |
|
This brief article discusses the perspective that
Loran should be viewed as
an excellent complement to GPS, and that combining GPS with Loran
would
provide a hybrid national system with capabilities much better than
either
technology by itself. |
|
|
|
A New Era for a New Loran By G. Linn Roth, President,
Locus, Inc.
|
50kb |
|
Over the last several years, while the nation migrated
away from a sole-means GPS approach to critical infrastructure operations,
Loran changed in a substantial way, rapidly evolving into a modern
system that can provide unprecedented capabilities as a GNSS backup
in numerous critical infrastructure operations. Over these same
years, the FAA identified Loran as “the best theoretical backup”
to GPS, and rigorous studies of a modern Loran system have removed
the “theoretical” qualifier. Today, we are entering
a new era for a new Loran, now referred to as “enhanced”
or e-Loran. In this brief article, I would like to summarize what
is going on and what we might expect in this e-Loran era. |
|
|
|
Advantages
of a Combined GPS/Loran-C Precision Timing Receiver by
James Jacoby, Paul W. Schick, Frank Richwalksi and Kevin Zamzow, Locus,
Incorporated as presented at Loran-C, Satellite and Integrated Systems
for the 21st Century, November 1999.
|
112kb |
|
In Europe, Asia, and other areas, there is reluctance
to depend on GPS as the primary timing reference
source (PRS) for a critical part of a nation’s infrastructure,
hence an alternative PRS, such
as Loran, is highly desirable. Essential requirements for that alternative
would be the ability to
provide timing performance similar to that of GPS and to distribute
coordinated universal time
(UTC).
Advances in Loran receiver technology, coupled with newer NELS
and FERNS chains and
planned upgrades to the North American stations, has made Loran
as high a quality primary timing
reference as GPS, and it can be superior in many circumstances.
For example, Loran can
provide near Cesium clock quality at the receiver site, can generate
UTC, and can penetrate urban
environments difficult for GPS reception. When coupled with a rubidium
oscillator, GPS
receiver, or both, a Loran receiver can be integrated into a system
that would provide high timing
performance with superior reliability.
Timing data from a new generation Loran receiver will be presented
along with predictions of
accuracy improvements that will follow implementation of Cesium
clock and UTC synchronization
updates to the CONUS Loran stations. Timing accuracy of standalone
GPS timing will be
demonstrated. Finally, performance advantages of integrated Ru/Loran
and GPS/Ru/Loran timing
systems will be discussed, and implications of encoding UTC in the
Eurofix data stream will
be reviewed..
|
|
|